The actual UCCS findings file a client receives from a review — anonymized and unedited. 133 sheets, already run through a top-5 GC's own coordination process. Every finding below is what an independent, owner-side pass adds on top of that review.
Sort it, filter it, open any row for the full write-up
The full register
Sheet reference, mechanism, dollar range, schedule impact — one line each. Click any row for the full write-up; click a column header to sort.
| # | Severity | Category | Sheet reference | Finding | Cost exposure | Schedule |
|---|
Click any row for the full finding. Click a column header to sort.
The four critical findings, in full
Permit blockers, missing life-safety systems, and scope no trade can price. Every finding in the register is written to this standard — these four get the long form because they're the ones that don't wait.
No UPS or emergency generator is shown anywhere in the set for the server rooms, the Watch Center, or the security panels. On a mission-critical facility, backup power is not an optional system — it's the reason the building exists.
Wet-pipe sprinkler is explicitly prohibited above S103, but no alternative suppression system — clean agent or pre-action — is specified anywhere in the set. As drawn, this room cannot pass permit.
The G2.4.X additive alternate drawings are referenced 12+ times across every discipline in the set — and do not exist anywhere in the issued package. No trade can price the full scope of work without them.
The CRAC condensate pump discharge route passes through a fire-rated assembly with no firestop detail or listed system called out anywhere in the set. An unaddressed penetration of a rated assembly is a life-safety code violation — it fails inspection as drawn and, if built, compromises the rating of the assembly.
What to resolve before award
Exactly as they'd appear in your debrief call.
Critical means permit-blocking, life-safety, or unbiddable scope. Documentation errors land in Medium no matter how widespread.
Schedule risk runs alongside the dollars: 138–252 days tied up in the four critical findings alone, against 343–716 days across the full register. On a mission-critical build, that is the difference between hitting a lease commencement date and missing it.
Why this file exists
So instead of telling you about the process, we're giving you the output — unedited except for the names, at the same level of specificity a paying client gets: sheet reference, mechanism, dollar range, schedule impact, one line each.
Twenty-six findings. Four critical. All twenty-six turned up on a set that had already been through a general contractor's own internal coordination review — which is the case for why a dedicated, owner-side pass is worth running alongside it, not instead of it. One independent, cross-discipline pass: drawings vs. drawings, drawings vs. specs, trade vs. trade.
Software flags maybes. This file puts a dollar figure — and our own fee — on every one of them.
What this looks like on your project
One set. 48-hour turnaround. Every conflict located by sheet and detail, with a dollar range and a fix — at the exact standard you just read. If we don't find at least $50,000 in exposure, you pay nothing. If we do, it's $3,000 — credited in full toward a full-project engagement.
jrossi@preemptglobal.com · (570) 776-5660 · NDA before any document changes hands
— Joe Rossi, Founding Principal, Preempt Global